挺拔SINUS一闪MAX与岸度PLASMA 血浆470 MAX对比初评
<!--><xml><w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:PunctuationKerning/>
<w:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing>7.8 磅</w:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing>
<w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>
<w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>2</w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:SpaceForUL/>
<w:BalanceSingleByteDoubleByteWidth/>
<w:DoNotLeaveBackslashAlone/>
<w:ULTrailSpace/>
<w:DoNotExpandShiftReturn/>
<w:AdjustLineHeightInTable/>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
<w:UseFELayout/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><!--><!--><xml>
<w:LatentStyles deflockedstate="false" latentstylecount="156">
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><!--><!-->
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:普通表格;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
</style>
<!-->
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">本人红黑碳王</span><span lang="EN-US">7.6</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"">横，两面反胶。正手原来一直使用狂三，但因为实在受够了狂三恶劣的品控、灌胶水的麻烦以及狂三的重量，所以前段时间把正手换成了血浆</span><span lang="EN-US">470 MAX</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">。打了大概两三个星期，手法调整后已经完全适应了涩性套胶。</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">各方面表现都不错，唯一不足之处是德套基本都存在的虚弹感。于是在拜读了多篇经典德套测评后入手了挺拔一闪，现在已经使用了一个星期，</span><span lang="EN-US">SINUS</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">的表现只能用惊艳来形容。</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"">和一闪都应该算是德套里偏暴力的套胶，我现以对比的方式将自己对两款套胶的粗浅感受写下来。本人不是什么器材达人，望各位多拍砖。</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l1 level1="level1"lfo1;
tab-stops:list 18.0pt"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"" lang="EN-US"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">1.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New="New"Roman"">
</span></span></span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">重量、厚度及硬度</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">一闪的重量比</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"">略重，但我自己感觉这个重量差对摆速没有明显的影响。二者厚度相差无几，大概都在</span><span lang="EN-US">2.1-2.2mm</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">之间。一闪的整体硬度略高于</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">，发力时没有</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"">那么容易透板。</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l1 level1="level1"lfo1;
tab-stops:list 18.0pt"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"" lang="EN-US"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">2.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New="New"Roman"">
</span></span></span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">胶面</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">一闪和</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"">的胶面都是纯涩性的，几乎没有粘性。但用一闪可以发出旋转非常强的下旋球，个人感觉旋转强度和狂三有的一拼，只不过是摩擦手法略有差别。而</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">的旋转则较弱。</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">3. </span><span style="font-family:宋体;
mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">摆短及搓球</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">一闪和</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"">都被视为暴力而难控的套胶，可是配在我的红黑上并没有显得很难控。虽然没有粘性国套那么容易控制小球，但适应一段时间后只要稍微调整一下触球角度，小球可以控制的很好。搓球时一定要把板型亮开一些，搓出去的球线路很低平而且速度较快。一闪搓球的旋转要明显强于</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">。这两款套胶在红黑这种被视为“难控”的底板上小球方面尚且表现不错，估计在其他较柔和的底板上小球方面会更好。</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1="level1"lfo2;
tab-stops:list 18.0pt"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"" lang="EN-US"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">4.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New="New"Roman"">
</span></span></span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">起下旋球</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">无论是拉高吊弧圈还是挑台内弱下旋时</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">都很稳定，能够感觉到球撞入胶面和后面柔软的海面后被胶面“咬住”然后被球拍甩出去，即使来球再转，只要动作到位了，都可以起来（这也彻底颠覆了我以前认为涩套难起下旋的想法）。但如果使用狂三那种薄摩擦的手法，球肯定会下网。而一闪的脱板要明显快于</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">，必须快速完成动作，否则球会乱飞。而且在轻挑台内球时</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">的表现比较线性，发多大力出多少球，心里比较有底。而一闪则有时会出现稍微用力过度球会飞出去好远，而稍微用力不足就会软绵绵地下网。但在暴挑时只要动作做到了，一闪打出去的球真的是一道白光。昨天一个球友发弱下旋球到我正手小三角而且球比较高，我发力挑打。我只听见了清脆的啪的一声，但没看清球是否上台了。我问他球上了吗，他说听到球砸球台的声音，应该是上了。我承认挑打出这种质量的球有</span><span lang="EN-US">85%</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">是瞎蒙的成分，但这还是能证明一闪的暴力。</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:18.0pt;text-indent:-18.0pt;mso-list:l0 level1="level1"lfo2;
tab-stops:list 18.0pt"><span style="mso-fareast-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"" lang="EN-US"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">5.<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New="New"Roman"">
</span></span></span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">攻球</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">一闪的脱板速度明显高于</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"">，小力量击打时稍微动作不到位一闪就会出现球乱飞的情况。而</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"">则显得较为温顺。发力击打时二者的弧线都非常低平，速度上</span><span lang="EN-US">SINUS</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"">要快于</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:
宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">，而且一闪感觉非常扎实，而</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">则有点虚弹，一闪的球质要明显更重。我在打球两小时前用海夫蓝鲸二薄薄地给一闪刷了一层，发力打出去的球就像是炮轰出去的，只要打上了基本就不太可能被防回来了，但脱板太快了，而且太太太弹了，也许有高手能够对此驾驭自如，但本人实在无法控制，打上一板虽然很爽，但失误太多了。第二天再打球时就会觉得没有那么弹了，失误少了很多，击打的杀伤力也完全够了，可见一闪基本上实现了免灌，也许每隔两三个星期撕下来薄薄地刷一遍再粘上就好了。</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">6. </span><span style="font-family:宋体;
mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">前冲弧圈球</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">一闪的脱板速度明显高于</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"">，容错明显低于</span><span lang="EN-US">470. 470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"">在各个档位上都较稳定，而一闪则是越发力越稳定。在动作充分到位的情况下一闪的球质要明显高于</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">，在速度、旋转和力量方面都是如此。</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">与一闪相比最大的劣势也就在这里。据说旧配方的</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">极其暴力，但采用新配方后</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"">的确比原来耐用了，可是在发足力量冲球（和攻球）时，不能让人体会到那种暴力的感觉，显得底气不足。而一闪则会让崇尚暴力的人得到充分的满足，我打球四年多，用红黑配一闪后才第一次冲出了被对手形容为“一道白光”的球，那种满足感真的是难以言表，甚至比多赢几场球还开心。而且经过一些天的磨合我越来越发现一闪没有想象的那么难以驾驭，实战的成绩要比原来用狂三和</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">时要好一点，这也坚定了我继续使用一闪的信心，相信这个配置还有很大的潜力尚待挖掘，现在需要做的就是苦练技术了。</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">总结：</span><span lang="EN-US">PLASMA 470
MAX</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">与挺拔一闪都比较适合</span><span lang="EN-US">7</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:
"Times New="New"Roman"">夹。</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:
宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">表现更加线性、稳定、易控，但在高档位时会略显虚弱，对于不过分追求暴力的人而言是块特点较为突出、各方面性能较为均衡的德套。如果能够每两三个星期撕下来薄薄地刷层胶水，</span><span lang="EN-US">470</span><span style="font-family:宋体;mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New="New"Roman"">会变得更加通透而且速度会略快。挺拔一闪不愧为目前最具杀伤力的涩套之一，完全不依赖于胶水。速度力量超强，旋转不弱。对于那些能够驾驭它的人而言，它仿佛是匹日行千里、一骑绝尘、让他人望尘莫及的宝马，对于无法驾驭它的人而言这是匹脱缰的野马。</span></p> 好文章，长了不少见识，谢谢楼主分享！ 用心的感受，好！ 看帖是学习，回帖是美德，好贴就要顶！ 想把一闪放反手不知道效果会怎样 同感！ 好，刚好是我一直想对比的2个胶皮。看来我安心470就行了。 <img src="http://www.pingpang.info/bbs/images/sxh.gif"/> 强烈支持<font color="#ff0000">楼主</font>观点，送鲜花一朵鼓励！ <p>非常好的心得测评！ <span style="FONT-FAMILY: 宋体; mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times new=" Roman"? new="New" mso-hansi-font-family:"Times Roman"; New?>一闪</span>正手配在软而弹的枫木7 上 合适么？ </p> 楼主写的很专业，一定是高手了。