[讨论]关于蝴蝶王底板与蝴蝶张继科底板的问题

7楼[em1002]

 用过VIS，没打过ZJK。

对TBS，VIS和ZJK这三块拍子，有人做过详细比较。

handle:
timo boll spirit -> the thinnest of the three.
zhang jike -> squarish like the "timo boll spirit" but wider.
viscaria -> more round, similar to stiga latest handles.

balance:
timo boll spirit -> head heavy.
viscaria -> medium balance.
zhang jike -> medium tending more towards the handle.

hardness/feel:
timo boll spirit -> hardest
not so easy to tell between "zhang jike" and "viscaria".
I think "zhang jike" is more flexible as a whole, it absorbs more the incoming energy.
the "viscaria" feels softer on impact but doesn't flex or absorb as much energy as "zhang jike".
so "zhang jike" feels harder but seems to absorb more the energy of the incoming ball.

dwell time:
timo boll spirit -> lowest
viscaria -> medium
zhang jike -> highest

speed:
timo boll spirit -> fastest
viscaria -> medium
zhang jike -> slowest

control:
zhang jike -> highest
viscaria -> medium
timo boll spirit -> lowest

power in loops and smashes:
timo boll spirit: highest power
viscaria: medium power
zhang jike: lowest power

composition:
by looks you can't tell any difference.
they all look the same.
butterfly site says viscaria has balsa as center ply.
is this true?
well the center ply is a little bit softer than the others at touch.
but that's all.
looks like the kiri of the other blades and feels at touch just a little bit softer.

note:
the differences between the three models are quite small.
they could be more related wood used, small variations in the building process, etc. rather than intentional differences between different models.

原贴链接在这里：http://tabletennisonline.org/blades/zhang-jike-vs-viscaria-vs-timo-boll-spirit/

楼主写的很专业，一定是高手了。